ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A control 8.24, "Use of cryptography," is the clause of an information security management system (ISMS) that governs how an organization uses encryption. It is deliberately standard-agnostic: it names no algorithms and no key lengths, and it says nothing about post-quantum cryptography. Its role in a PQC programme is different and increasingly load-bearing — it is the governance hook under which a certification auditor now asks whether you actually know where your cryptography lives and whether you have a plan for the quantum transition. The detailed implementation guidance lives in ISO/IEC 27002:2022 §8.24; in the 2013 edition this same material sat under A.10.1.
Why it matters
A crypto policy written a decade ago typically says "use AES-256 and RSA-2048" and stops. That is no longer sufficient evidence. The RSA- and ECDH-protected data being harvested today can be decrypted retroactively once a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists, so an ISMS that cannot say which systems, protocols, and third parties depend on quantum-vulnerable algorithms cannot manage the risk it is certified to manage. Auditors have begun probing quantum readiness directly under A.8.24, and a two-line approved-algorithm list is now a finding waiting to happen.
What the control requires
A.8.24 rests on two normative pillars: a policy on the use of cryptographic controls — a documented, risk-based statement of which controls apply where — and key management across the full lifecycle. Read forward for PQC, both pillars now have to account for algorithm change rather than a fixed set of primitives:
- A crypto policy that addresses algorithm selection, deprecation, and crypto-agility — swapping primitives without re-architecting — not just a static approved-algorithm list.
- Key management covering generation, distribution, storage, rotation, archival, and retirement/destruction, sized for larger post-quantum keys and longer transition windows.
- A maintained cryptographic inventory — the evidence that you know what you run — ideally exported as a machine-readable CBOM.
- A documented algorithm-transition plan aligned to external drivers such as the federal inventory mandate and the NIST migration timeline.
A two-algorithm policy is no longer audit evidence
The old test — does the policy name an approved cipher and key length — has quietly been superseded. What an A.8.24 auditor increasingly wants to see is the inventory, a quantum-risk assessment against it, and a transition plan. If your ISMS documentation stops at "AES/RSA," decide now whether to build that evidence deliberately or explain its absence during the certification audit.
How quantakrypto helps
We turn A.8.24 from a paragraph in your ISMS into defensible evidence. Our audit produces the cryptographic inventory and the quantum-risk assessment auditors ask for; our migration engineering delivers the documented transition plan and the crypto-agility to execute it without breaking production; and our certification work verifies that the implementations you actually ship match the policy you wrote. The result is a control that survives scrutiny rather than one that reads well until someone asks for the inventory behind it.
Frequently asked questions
Does ISO 27001 A.8.24 require post-quantum cryptography?
No. A.8.24 is standard-agnostic — it names no algorithms and imposes no post-quantum requirement. Its relevance is as a governance hook: an ISMS crypto policy is now expected to address algorithm lifecycle, crypto-agility, and a maintained cryptographic inventory, and certification auditors increasingly probe quantum risk under this control.
Where did this control live in ISO/IEC 27001:2013?
The 2022 edition consolidated the older cryptography material into a single Annex A control, 8.24. In the 2013 edition the same requirements were split across A.10.1 ("Cryptographic controls"), specifically A.10.1.1 on the policy and A.10.1.2 on key management. If you are mapping an existing ISMS forward, that is the crosswalk.
What is the difference between ISO 27001 A.8.24 and ISO 27002 §8.24?
ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A states the control as a certifiable requirement — the "what." ISO/IEC 27002:2022 §8.24 provides the detailed implementation guidance — the "how," including the policy content and the key-lifecycle stages. Certification is against 27001; 27002 is the reference you build your controls against.
What evidence should we prepare for an A.8.24 quantum-readiness review?
Three artifacts: a maintained cryptographic inventory (ideally a machine-readable CBOM), a quantum-risk assessment mapping harvest-now-decrypt-later exposure against that inventory, and a documented algorithm-transition plan. A crypto policy that lists a cipher and a key length, with none of these behind it, is the gap auditors are now trained to find.
Work with us on ISO 27001 A.8.24
Related reading
References
- ISO: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 — Information security management systems — Requirements (Annex A control 8.24).
- ISO: ISO/IEC 27002:2022 — Information security controls (implementation guidance for §8.24).
- ISMS.online: Annex A 8.24 — Use of Cryptography — a practitioner explainer of the policy and key-management expectations.